Cybersecurity

Week 7 Discussion on Cybercrime Policing

Week 7 Discussion on Cybercrime Policing

Due: Nov 3 at 11:59pm
Course: SOC 305 Cybercrime: A Sociological Perspective

Introduction

In this week's discussion, we delve into the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in policing cybercrime. Drawing insights from David Wall's video "Policing Cybercrime," we explore the complexities of investigating and prosecuting cybercrimes in the digital age. As technology advances, so do the methods employed by cybercriminals, posing unique obstacles for traditional policing methods. Let's examine the key takeaways from the video and discuss the implications for law enforcement in combating cybercrime.

Key Challenges in Policing Cybercrime

Policing cybercrime presents a formidable challenge for traditional law enforcement agencies. Law enforcement policy and standard practices have evolved to address physical crimes. In contrast, digital cyber threats are constantly adapting, taking advantage of individuals in other jurisdictions where law enforcement may have to navigate complex legal frameworks to prosecute offenders.

The anonymity provided by VPNs, Tor networks, and digital currencies makes it much harder to track down perpetrators of cybercrimes. With the large number of cybercrimes being committed, law enforcement agencies are often overwhelmed and under-resourced without the help of automation and machine learning tools to assist in identifying patterns and potential threats.

Lastly, cybercrime often goes unreported due to the bias of the severity of the crime and victims feeling helpless or embarrassed. This underreporting leads to a shortage of resources to combat cybercrime effectively.

Overall, global cooperation and the use of advanced technologies by every law enforcement agency are required to hold cybercriminals accountable.

Summary and Critical Evaluation of "Obstacles to Cybercrime Investigations"

UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) published an article titled "Obstacles to Cybercrime Investigations," which delves into the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in investigating and prosecuting cybercrimes. This summary and critical evaluation aim to provide an overview of the key points discussed in the article, analyze its implications, and offer a critical perspective on the effectiveness of current investigative practices.

Summary

Among the various obstacles authorities must face when investigating cybercrimes, the article highlights the following key challenges:

1. Anonymity and Anonymization Techniques: Cybercriminals exploit anonymity provided by legitimate tools like proxy servers, The Onion Router (Tor), and anonymized IP addresses to conceal their identities and activities. They're also able to host websites on the dark web allowing like-minded individuals with malicious intent to share information and tools for cybercrimes while remaining hidden.

2. Attribution and Traceback: Determining who is responsible for cybercrime is another challenge that is made even more difficult when cybercriminals use malware-infected devices or botnets to commit crimes. Back-tracing illicit acts to their source is time-consuming and resource-intensive, especially when perpetrators use anonymization techniques to hide their identities.

3. Legal and Evidentiary Challenges: National and international legal frameworks often have stringent communication and cooperation requirements for sharing digital evidence and information across borders. The lack of harmonized cybercrime laws and mutual legal assistance agreements hinders effective investigations and prosecutions.

Critical Evaluation

Given that one of the primary obstacles encountered by law enforcement and government agencies is "brain drain" or the loss of skilled cybercrime investigators to the private sector, private tech companies and cybersecurity firms should have a legal obligation to contribute to the public good by sharing resources and tools alongside providing training to law enforcement agencies. This would help bridge the gap between the public and private sectors, enhancing the overall capacity of law enforcement to combat cybercrime effectively. A better-trained workforce will be more willing and able to tackle the challenges posed by cybercriminals.

Adversary nations often exploit the digital infrastructure of other countries to launch cyberattacks due to the difficulty of pinpointing who the perpetrator of a cybercrime is. Training lawmakers to understand the basics of cybersecurity would be beneficial in creating more effective legislation for fighting cybercrime. This would also help in creating a more secure digital environment for citizens and businesses.

Conclusion

The article "Obstacles to Cybercrime Investigations" provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges faced by law enforcement agencies in investigating cybercrimes. By addressing the issues of anonymity, attribution, legal frameworks, and the need for enhanced cooperation between public and private sectors, authorities can better equip themselves to combat cybercriminal activities effectively. The critical evaluation suggests that a multi-faceted approach involving training, resource sharing, and legislative reforms is essential to overcome the obstacles and strengthen the investigative capabilities of law enforcement agencies in the digital age.